This is not the sensationalized program aired on CBS in 1993 which depicted Noah’s Ark protruding from the ice on Mt. Ararat. That program was later shown to have been based on falsified stories, myth, and bogus documents. According to archeologists and scholars, this is the real Ark site. Here is the evidence, including photographs and film footage, to prove it. With the aid of aerial reconnaissance, technologically advanced sensing devices, controlled chemical analysis and strict archeological field work, this program presents the evidence that suggests scientists have indeed found the final resting place of Noah’s Ark as described in the Bible and the Book of Genesis. Includes photos, video, physical evidence and interviews with researchers. Discovery of Noah’s Ark – The Best Evidence, NOW on DVD in a New Extended 2-DVD Special Edition — Includes 2 separate presentations: Discovery of Noah’s Ark and Noah’s Ark Found? Cat# K458 – Go to www.UFOTV.com.
Video Rating: 4 / 5



25 Comments to “Noah’s Ark Found? – The Best Evidence”


  1. logicforfirstgraders — 17th June 2012 @ 11:10 am

    a lack of proof of a negative is not proof of a positive. Unicorns can never be proven to not exist.
    There is a difference in definition of ‘theory’ in general use and in scientific use. In science a theory is “a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment.” Evolution has done this. the predictions made by it are tested on each new species discovered and it has passed ALL sofar

  2. TheCamarofly — 17th June 2012 @ 11:36 am

    Inorder to disprove a claim you need to go to the source and do your own research. I think anyone would agree. Now the claim is a boat in the mountains of Turkey, right? So how many of you have gone there to disprove it? I don’t mean to offend, but to push you to know 100% what is real. But you do know that evolution is widely claimed as “Theory” right? look up theory in the dictionary and get back to me

  3. tomjscott — 17th June 2012 @ 12:20 pm

    You’re right. That insult to my manhood was what convinced me. How silly of me.

  4. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 12:53 pm

    “What does evolution have to do with this object being NoahsArk”
    …being that it’s not noah’s ark, and actually a COMMON geological feature made of rock? absolutely NOTHING

  5. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 1:48 pm

    “I would have to say that this thing is a boat”
    you’d have to say it’s a boat because you’re gullible and you believe known liars

    “I only know that the Bible does account for a boat of this nature”
    no more than harry potter books account for wizards

    “I can honestly say the story matches the Bible”
    because you accept on faith silly fairy tales. there’s ZERO evidence for a global flood. if you understood science, you’d realize this couldn’t be noah’s ark

  6. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 1:53 pm

    …said the guy who is breathtakingly ignorant of science. go read that website, and if you have a half decent pair of balls, you’ll come back and apologize for being a complete ignorant douche

  7. TheCamarofly — 17th June 2012 @ 2:40 pm

    Putting all of the factors together and kicking the Bible and Evolution out of the picture, I would have to say that this thing is a boat. A BIG prehistoric boat way above sea level. Now putting Evolution and the Bible back in the picture, what do we have? Well I only know that the Bible does account for a boat of this nature. I don’t know anything to do with science, but as an observer I can honestly say the story matches the Bible. What does evolution have to do with this object being NoahsArk

  8. tomjscott — 17th June 2012 @ 3:02 pm

    That made absolutely no sense whatsoever.

  9. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 3:10 pm

    “Profanity and insults don’t lend much credibility to anything you say”
    profanity has nothing to do with evidence, even as dumb as you are, you should realize that. if you don’t want to be called a fucking idiot, then stop saying fucking idiotic things

    “Evolution by natural selection is a fact. The rest is a belief and not science”
    natural selection is just a small part of it. the rest is backed by mountains of evidence
    evolution.berkeleyDOTedu

    GO!

  10. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 3:14 pm

    There’s approx. 150B stars in every galaxy, and over 150B galaxies…It’s a mathematical certainty, we are not alone

    “having this debate as intelligent, sentient beings?”
    I’m having a battle of wits with an unarmed person. it’s like shooting fish in a barrel

    “Come on, think for once”
    look, you do the praying, i’ll do the thinking. let’s see where it gets us. prayer has been shown not to work, science works

    go spend a few weeks reading the berkeley site then come back and apologize like a man

  11. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 4:13 pm

    “Let’s just stop and use our brains for a second”
    yes, i’m tired of doing the thinking for the both of us

    “the universe began from a singularity and just hydrogen and helium atoms”

    “would you conclude that in billions of years we would have all the life”
    well, consider our sample size is ONE, i’d say the chances of it happening are 100%
    and guess what? recent evidence shows that there could be 100,000 planets to every star, and guess what?

  12. tomjscott — 17th June 2012 @ 4:21 pm

    Let’s just stop and use our brains for a second and leave science and religion out of the picture completely. If, in fact, the universe began from a singularity and just hydrogen and helium atoms, as an intelligent, reasoning, being, would you conclude that in billions of years we would have all the life we have now and that we’d be even having this debate as intelligent, sentient beings? Come on, think for once.

  13. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 5:01 pm

    “You are not very well read in these matters”
    sorry to keep busting your bubble of stupid, I’m thoroughly versed in the latest in biology and paleontology, unlike you

    “I guarantee you I can stump you on more questions”
    i guarantee i’ve heard it all before, will make you look like the uneducated idiot you are, and because you suffer from Dunning Kruger effect, you will continue to deny it

    I’m also beginning to think you’re a poe

  14. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 5:54 pm

    “you see all the lies he exposes in science books”
    Each and every one of his ignorant lies has been thoroughly debunked. He knowingly still repeats them. It’s well documented, as i already provided evidence for

    “he was a science teacher for 10 years”
    BULLSHIT. he home schooled his idiot son for 10 yrs. Kent has ZERO scientific training or experience. There is no record of him ever haven taught in a school EVER

    “he loves science”
    he doesn’t understand science. he loves lying for jesus

  15. tomjscott — 17th June 2012 @ 6:40 pm

    Profanity and insults don’t lend much credibility to anything you say. Evolution by natural selection is a fact. The rest is a belief and not science.

  16. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 6:59 pm

    “It’s ridiculous that I even have to provide any evidence at all ”
    but that’s the way things work in the world: you make a claim, then it’s up to you to provide evidence to back it or stop making the claim!

    “Nobody knows because it didn’t happen”
    …said the ignoramus with a gross misunderstanding about evolution

    “that actually came from a modern textbook”
    then provide the name of the book, and the publisher and date

    “Watch Kent Hovind’s video”
    i’ve seen them all. they’re absurd & ignorant

  17. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 7:39 pm

    “Answer the question on the seed”
    i did!

    ” What Berkley website?”
    *sigh* i already did this too. evolution.berkeleyDOTedu

    “I received a 3.96 GPA in college”
    irrelevant. who the fuck cares?

    ” I’m well educated”
    you’re embarrassingly undereducated, but there’s still hope for you

    “a human being could have evolved from a rock”
    stupid ignorant douche, as i already explained you’re confusing chemistry and biology. if you don’t understand evolution, how can you criticize it?

  18. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 8:13 pm

    “Explain which came first, the seed or the fruit that contains the seed”
    same as the egg coming before the chicken, the seed came first

    more on Hovind: see vids by thunderf00t, cdk007, shanedk, and extantdodos
    they not only systematically dismantle every single ignorant claim by Kent Hovind, (and ben stein) but they show solid evidence he knowingly lies about his slides he shows his sheeple

    also: google “hovind dissertation”, he has ZERO scientific training (like you) and bought his diploma

  19. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 9:00 pm

    Top ignorant creationist douchebags in order of retardedness:
    1)nephilimfree
    2)venomfangx
    3)kent hovind
    4)eric hovind
    5)ben stein

    “Don’t let the religion of Evolution”
    more proof you’re fucking stupid. evolution CANNOT be a religion by definition

    “To say that it’s a fact is”
    where ALL the available evidence points to. we’re as certain of evolution as we are the theory the earth revolves around the sun. only the truly uneducated brainwashed and breath takingly ignorant can claim it’s not a fact

  20. tomjscott — 17th June 2012 @ 9:14 pm

    Answer the question on the seed. What Berkley website? This is the first I’ve heard you say about that. I received a 3.96 GPA in college and that included a 4.0 in Astronomy. I’m well educated. And I am able to use my brain and see that there is no way that a human being could have evolved from a rock. How can you freakin believe such nonsense? It’s ridiculous that I even have to provide any evidence at all it’s just that stupid to beleive what you believe.

  21. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 9:23 pm

    “Sorry you’ve been duped by the biggest hoax in history”
    no little maggot, unlike you, i’m educated. i didn’t fall asleep in science class. i understand both biology and evolution. go to the berkeley website and read it, like you said you would

    “Read the site on… or watch some of Kent Hovind’s debates with scientists”
    Kent doesn’t debate scientists, he repeats ignorant lies even after he’s been corrected by scientists. There’s vids all over YT ridiculing kent and exposing his lies

  22. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 9:45 pm

    “Where did the laws of the universe come from?”
    from the mass and matter

    ” is usually associated to the creation of a living system “from scratch”
    “usually associated” because up until then, life wasn’t created in the lab

    “the only thing it proves is that it takes an intelligent creator to do so”
    this is called an argument from ignorance. we don’t know how/why abiogenesis happened. Don’t forget the miller urey experiments: watch?v=9JaYWEsT7fU
    and watch: watch?v=U6QYDdgP9eg

  23. tomjscott — 17th June 2012 @ 10:22 pm

    Nobody knows because it didn’t happen. And that actually came from a modern textbook and something similar in Scientific America. Watch Kent Hovind’s video on 100 reasons why evolution is so stupid and you see all the lies he exposes in science books. BTW, he was a science teacher for 10 years and he loves science. You are not very well read in these matters. I guarantee you I can stump you on more questions that will expose the hoax of evolution than you can think possible.

  24. lennyhipp — 17th June 2012 @ 11:21 pm

    “You need to do some more research”
    sorry to burst your bubble of ignorance, i’m well read in these matters

    “On actual science textbook says”
    that is either a child’s science book, or one from the 50s or something… no modern text would describe it as nothing or explosion, and it’s much closer to 13.5BYA

    “I know all about the singularity crap too”
    if you knew about it, you wouldnt call it crap

    “Where did it come from?”
    nobody knows

    “Where did the energy come from?”
    nobody knows

  25. tomjscott — 17th June 2012 @ 11:56 pm

    You need to do some more research. On actual science textbook says the following: “In the realm of the universe, nothing really means nothing. Not only matter and energy would disappear, but also space and time. However, physicists theorize that from this state of nothingness the universe began in a gigantic explosion about 16.5 billion years ago.” I know all about the singularity crap too. Where did it come from? Where did the energy come from? Where did the laws of the universe come from?



Write a comment


Name




    
Cw Cats is based on WordPress platform, RSS tech , RSS comments design by Gx3.