This was the hardest film for us to post here at UFOTV as most of us were born around the Apollo era and we hold NASA’s achievement of landing a Man on the Moon and bringing him safely back, as sacred. But in the interest of remaining neutral and posting all information on controversies in science, regardless of our personal beliefs and those of the management at UFOTV, we bring you what critics have chosen as the greatest filmed investigation on this matter to date. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Part 2: Environmental Dangers and Part 3: The Trouble with Rockets – This compelling video throws into serious doubt the authenticity of the Apollo missions and features information that challenges the declared abilities of NASA to successfully send a man to the Moon and return him safely to Earth. New evidence clearly suggests that NASA hoaxed pictures allegedly taken on the lunar surface. These findings are supported by analysis and the testimony of experts from a wide variety of scientific disciplines. As powerful as the evidence presented in this film and its sister film may seem, we highly recommend that you view our film called “Quantum Hologram & ESP – Astronaut Edgar Mitchell,” that sheds light on Edgar Mitchell’s experience as the 6th man to walk upon the Moon and his experience aboard Apollo 14 at that time. His experience during this mission as described on this presentation must not be overlooked. What Happened On the Moon? – An Investigation Into Apollo – NOW ON DVD – Full

25 Comments to “Dark Mission 2 & 3 – NASA Moon Hoax – Environmental Dangers & The Trouble with Rockets”

  1. nonesuch321 — 19th June 2012 @ 9:53 am

    They were not in the belt long enough to die.
    The Van Allen radiation belts extend from about 600 miles up to over 40,000 miles from Earth with the region of highest radiation intensity being between around 2,000 miles and 12,000 miles above Earth. The astronauts exposure to those belts is brief (less than 4 hours total – they begin their time in this region while traveling at 25,000 MPH! They spend less than an hour in the densest part of the belt and are well protected in their spacecraft.

  2. Glinkaism1 — 19th June 2012 @ 10:16 am

    New words to old song–

    “Hey, it’s only a film stage moon

    shinning over a composite sky.

    But it wouldn’t be make believe

    if you believed in NASA.” 

  3. krisdevalle — 19th June 2012 @ 10:17 am

    What facts are false?

  4. krisdevalle — 19th June 2012 @ 10:59 am

    I’m sorry but I thought you could explain what these flaws were, that we could all fathom out in the future. Are the flaws with the video footage? Or the still images? Or the 16mm film footage?

  5. Glinkaism1 — 19th June 2012 @ 11:06 am

    Like you, I have a movie background. You were into sfx. I do conventional shoots and edits.

    I like your detailed analysis. Other people don’t have your actual working knowledge.

  6. silver5790 — 19th June 2012 @ 11:28 am

    Thank you at least someone is waking up out of this dream the human race is in.

  7. silver5790 — 19th June 2012 @ 11:49 am

    yes my daughter found that out to our cost.

  8. Glinkaism1 — 19th June 2012 @ 12:27 pm

    We are most fortunate to have silver5790 to tell it like it is. Cheers!

  9. Glinkaism1 — 19th June 2012 @ 12:33 pm

    NASA just carries on the lies tradition. Sheeple have been trained to not question “scientific fact,” even if the “facts” are false.

  10. silver5790 — 19th June 2012 @ 1:17 pm

    If you faked the 1969 moon landings , why not fake the rest which they did.

  11. krisdevalle — 19th June 2012 @ 1:43 pm

    What flaws?

  12. YDDES — 19th June 2012 @ 2:04 pm

    Dream on!

  13. silver5790 — 19th June 2012 @ 2:27 pm

    They did not want fine detail in any photo or film shot, and some of the foreground and background detail is out of sync to.This would have been done in a dubbing and mixing studio on earth using layers in sequence again.So again the film and photos are hoaxed, but without working in the film industry the general public would think it was real.It is not the best hoax but it was good then.Infact someone working on the set production , put in the flaws so someone could fathom out in the future.

  14. silver5790 — 19th June 2012 @ 2:49 pm

    a factor of 10 , so then your talking of stages of 10 to 15 and so on then it will bring in detail to side and middle frames better not fantastic but better than before without distortion effects.So looking at the moon landing photos and film from you tube and other sites this tells me it was hoaxed at 150 or more percent of the sequence frames , because they did not want fine detail in the frames to spoil the hoax.Even with a fixed lense it could have been better in detail, it is because.

  15. silver5790 — 19th June 2012 @ 2:58 pm

    is either double the sequence up to say 30 percent then splice another sequence up so you get 60 percent in the frame , but as you go higher say 100 percent , you will get shut offs in the side frame.This will cut out any detail in the side and middle frame of the film or photo , but more in film than photo.This is what we call distortion effect.As you go higher up to lets say 200 percent of frame sequence , then it goes into a flux state .You then have to increase the step sequence to.

  16. silver5790 — 19th June 2012 @ 3:57 pm

    picked up on it , but some have including my good old friend george , who told me about it..Nothing new step frames in the movie industry , george lucas at industrial light and magic did it all the time on star wars movie.The secret is how it is done unless your in the movie industry like i was , you will not understand the sequence cheques in it.They usually range from 1 to 6 then 6 to 12, then you reverse all sequences then splice them in step stages.Then all you do to make it look bigger.

  17. silver5790 — 19th June 2012 @ 4:24 pm

    Believe what you want to believe Governments like people like you because your a easy target to control.Who says any vacuum was taken out?.O the signal theory again , i wish i had every dollar for that theory most idiots say i would be a billionaire instead of a millionaire that i am now ha ha ha.Have you heard of cross wave tunnel deflections.Well this is what they did on the fake moon missions to make out they had landed on the moon.I think it was a very good trick they did , pity no

  18. YDDES — 19th June 2012 @ 5:05 pm

    Yes, You are right, but sometimes he amuses me…

  19. YDDES — 19th June 2012 @ 5:21 pm

    Just too much ignorance to answer all Your unbelievable “claims”.
    Just a few things: “Easy to create vacuum in Pinewoods largest studios”???
    “Module just goes around Earth”, when hundreds of professionals and amateurs traced their signals all the way to Moon and back?
    There’s videos here on Youtube filmed from inside Saturn V’s while going out in space.
    A “technical adviser” doing it as a “hobby”?…
    “Joining together scenes in steps of frames” with live actors and a moving camera???

  20. Rob260259 — 19th June 2012 @ 5:34 pm

    You really don’t know much about space travel in general and Apollo in particular, do you?

  21. Rob260259 — 19th June 2012 @ 6:33 pm

    Forget it. Silver is a nutcase. A conspiritard at best. He’s especially saying “fake” because he’s unable to comprehend even basic physics.

  22. silver5790 — 19th June 2012 @ 7:01 pm

    So you know me then ha ha ha.

  23. silver5790 — 19th June 2012 @ 7:54 pm

    Yes lockheed had him as a technical adviser on the x plane programs and the hypersonic programs.

  24. silver5790 — 19th June 2012 @ 8:44 pm

    But that is it you seen the rocket go up big deal.You see nothing else eg no camera footage in the cockpit of astronauts no cameras outside of the rocket looking down to earth.I find this strange and why not? You have footage now of cameras inside of rockets and outside.The great event in history and no cameras in cockpit of astronauts=VERY STRANGE.=Astronauts are not in module never were.Module then goes around the earth for a couple of days , then falls back to earth in the sea.

  25. silver5790 — 19th June 2012 @ 8:50 pm

    no only george stringwell at JPL.So you think it was done in a very large studio bigger than say one of pinewoods then?.Maybe it was who knows it may have been done in a small studio in steps of frames .Then joined together to make out it was a very large landscape.Nothing new really.How do you think we created a scene on the moon , for u f o in 1977?.Who says they is a total vacuum in space?.A vacuum can easy be taken out nothing new there.The rockets went nowhere .Yes i seen the rocket go up.

Write a comment


Cw Cats is based on WordPress platform, RSS tech , RSS comments design by Gx3.